![]() So which is better? The boring answer is "it depends." Do you want a consistent mid-value commander? Then stick to Hakbal. Kumena requires you to run untappers to get full value while Hakbal doesn't need that. Hakbal requires a lot less setup to get value, but Kumena generates way more value once you're fully set up. But imagine Kumena, some merfolk, an untapper like Intruder Alarm and like Cryptolith Rite: you can tap to draw some cards, cast merfolk to untap the board, then keep tapping to draw and cast more merfolk and keep going!īasically Hakbal has a higher power floor than Kumena, but Kumena has a higher power ceiling. If I just have my commander and 2 merfolk on board, I'd much rather have Hakbal to explore 3x and then move to attack. ![]() Kumena requires a lot more setup than Hakbal but becomes far more powerful once you've got the right board state. ![]() Kumena turns Merfolk into a Tap/Untap deck: we tap down our army to draw cards and buff them with counters, then utilize mass untappers like Intruder Alarm to do it again and again.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |